Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2026 / April / Success and Failure Rates with Increased-Range-of-Focus IOLs
Refractive Discussion Insights

Success and Failure Rates with Increased-Range-of-Focus IOLs 

IRoF lenses offer high success, with some outperforming others

By Francesco Carones 4/23/2026 4 min read

Share

  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Listen
  • Report
  • Quiz
  • Poll
  • Top Institutions
Objective:

To evaluate the performance and patient satisfaction of different increased-range-of-focus (IRoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) in cataract surgery.

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • All four IOLs performed similarly on defocus curves and significantly better than monofocal IOLs.
    • Patients reported high rates of spectacle independence, especially for distance vision.
    • The TECNIS PureSee lens had the highest proportion of patients reporting no need for glasses and the least incidence of bothersome dysphotopsias.
    Interpretation:

    While all IRoF lenses provided satisfactory outcomes, the TECNIS PureSee lens was associated with higher patient satisfaction and lower rates of dissatisfaction compared to other lenses.

    Limitations:
    • The study was retrospective and not a prospective clinical trial.
    • The sample size was small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
    Conclusion:

    The study suggests that IRoF IOLs, particularly the TECNIS PureSee, offer excellent visual outcomes and high patient satisfaction, making them a viable choice for cataract surgery.

    This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: