The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Campaigns & Insights
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2026 / October / Revisiting Lifitegrast in DED
Anterior Segment Cornea News

Revisiting Lifitegrast in DED

New review presents data andevidence for the potential role of lifitegrast across a range of dry eye presentations

10/8/2026 2 min read

Share

  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Listen
  • Report
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll
5 Key Takeaways
  • 1

    Lifitegrast 5% is an LFA-1 antagonist indicated for DED signs and symptoms that disrupts LFA-1–ICAM-1 interactions and inflammatory signaling.

  • 2

    Across the OPUS trials, lifitegrast improved corneal staining in OPUS-1 and reduced eye dryness in OPUS-2 and OPUS-3, with symptom effects apparent by day 14.

  • 3

    A pooled post hoc analysis of OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 found greater odds of clinically meaningful improvement in corneal staining and eye dryness with lifitegrast.

  • 4

    In five randomized trials involving 2,464 patients, common adverse events included instillation-site irritation, reaction, or pain and dysgeusia; adverse-event discontinuations were relatively low.

  • 5

    Real-world studies generally reported improvements in DED symptoms, signs, and quality of life, while the review noted treatment persistence challenges and disclosed industry support and author relati

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: