The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Campaigns & Insights
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2026 / October / LASIK or Lenses?
Refractive News Latest

LASIK or Lenses?

New meta-analysis finds patient satisfaction strongly favors LASIK, despite mixed quality-of-life evidence

10/7/2026 2 min read

Share

  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Listen
  • Report
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll
  • Topic Commentary

Clinical Scorecard: LASIK or Lenses?

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionMyopia and vision correction with LASIK or contact lenses
Key MechanismsLASIK and contact lenses provide alternative vision correction; reported trade-offs include satisfaction, quality of life, adverse events, and dry eye symptoms.
Target PopulationPeople with myopia considering LASIK versus continued contact lens wear
Care SettingClinical counseling and assessment for vision correction

Key Highlights

  • A systematic review identified four studies with 2,141 participants: 1,275 LASIK recipients and 866 contact lens users.
  • Pooled quality-of-life results favored LASIK under a common-effect model, but the random-effects estimate was smaller and nonsignificant amid substantial heterogeneity.
  • Satisfaction was reported by 88% of LASIK patients and 54% of contact lens users; 97% of participants who switched from contact lenses to LASIK preferred LASIK.
  • One large study reported adverse events in 9.5% of LASIK patients and 19.9% of contact lens users.
  • Chronic dry eye was reported in 71% of contact lens wearers; LASIK-related symptoms affected around 50–58% of patients and were predominantly acute early after surgery.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess dry eye risk before LASIK, as emphasized by the study authors.

Management

  • Counsel patients individually, accounting for ocular health, lifestyle, and patient preferences when discussing LASIK and contact lenses.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • The authors call for larger prospective studies using standardized patient-reported outcomes and longer follow-up.

Risks

  • Discuss dry eye symptoms with both options; LASIK-related symptoms were predominantly acute in the early postoperative period.
  • The review reported adverse events including abrasion, infection, and ulceration.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Review participants with myopia: 1,275 LASIK recipients and 866 contact lens users across four studies.

Reported satisfaction was 88% after LASIK versus 54% with contact lenses; 97% of participants transitioning from contact lenses to LASIK preferred LASIK. Quality-of-life evidence was uncertain, and the authors rated overall evidence certainty low to moderate.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Assess dry eye risk before LASIK.
  • Provide individualized counseling that considers ocular health, lifestyle, and patient preferences.
  • Explain that satisfaction findings favored LASIK, while quality-of-life results were uncertain because of heterogeneity and study limitations.

Related Resources & Content

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis described in the article; published in Eye & ENT Research

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: