Objective:

To explore the emotional and psychological factors influencing clinicians' acceptance of new presbyopia correction methods, particularly how these factors shape decision-making.

Key Findings:

• Medical progress is often met with skepticism due to emotional ties to established practices, which can hinder innovation.
• New treatment concepts are perceived as challenges to professional identity, leading to resistance and reluctance to change.
• PRESBYOND offers a complementary approach to presbyopia correction, expanding depth of focus while addressing limitations of traditional methods.

Interpretation:

Resistance to new presbyopia treatments stems from a combination of emotional, psychological, and professional factors, highlighting the need for clinicians to remain open to innovative approaches.

Limitations:

• The article does not provide quantitative data to support claims about resistance to new treatments.
• Focuses primarily on psychological factors without addressing systemic barriers in healthcare.
• Lacks qualitative insights into clinician experiences with new treatment methods.

Conclusion:

Understanding presbyopia as a progressive process allows for a more flexible approach to treatment, integrating various methods to meet patient needs while considering emotional factors.