Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2026 / April / New Analysis Maps Whos Most Affected by Retinal Disease
Latest News Retina

New Analysis Maps Who’s Most Affected by Retinal Disease

Updated prevalence data highlight wide variations by race, sex, and region, pointing to unmet needs in eye care

4/14/2026 2 min read

Share


A meta-analysis published March 19 in JAMA Ophthalmology assessed United States prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). The investigators included data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Medicare fee-for-service claims, IBM MarketScan commercial insurance claims, and eligible population-based studies. The study also estimated disease burden of these 4 leading causes of vision impairment.

The study found that age-standardized prevalence of major retinal conditions in the United States per 100,000 people was 5,677 for AMD, 2,710 for DR, 317 for DME, and 214 for RVO, with higher rates in male patients and marked disparities across race and geography.  The analysis estimated that 21.9 million patients aged 40 years and older were living with AMD in 2022, corresponding to a crude prevalence of 13.6%. Approximately 10 million patients had DR, including 1.8 million with vision-threatening disease. DME affected 1.1 million patients, and RVO affected 0.9 million.  

Across conditions, prevalence was consistently higher in male vs female patients. For AMD, age-standardized prevalence was 6,104 per 100,000 in males vs 5,312 in females; for DR, 3,265 vs 2,211; for DME, 356 vs 281; and for RVO, 243 vs 191.  

Substantial differences were observed across racial and ethnic groups. AMD prevalence was 1.7 times higher in White vs Black patients. RVO prevalence was 2 times higher in White vs Hispanic patients. DR prevalence was more than 2 times higher in Black vs White patients and 1.8 times higher in Hispanic vs White patients. DME prevalence was 4.6 times higher in Black vs White patients and 3.7 times higher in Hispanic vs White patients.  

State-level variation was pronounced. AMD ranged from 3,497 to 7,214 per 100,000 by state. DR ranged from 1,654 to 3,607, DME ranged from 126 to 504, and RVO ranged from 157 to 273. The study showed higher DR and DME prevalence concentrated in southern states, whereas AMD and RVO demonstrated different regional distributions.  

Retina specialist availability varied widely, from 918 physicians in California to 3 in Wyoming. Patient-to-specialist ratios ranged from 30 to 6,345 depending on pathology and state, with the highest ratios observed in Wyoming for AMD, DR, and RVO, and in Mississippi for DME. Estimated annual payer costs were $13.41 billion for AMD, $6.23 billion for DR, $4.44 billion for DME, and $6.42 billion for RVO, with the highest total costs in California.  

The authors noted that some data sources were more than 15 years old and may not reflect current demographic trends. Claims data may underrepresent uninsured populations, and extrapolation from older populations was required for some conditions. Modeling assumptions, including imputation of missing data and age-related trends, may introduce uncertainty. Additionally, prevalence estimates did not account for co-occurring retinal conditions and assumed all cases were treated in cost analyses.  

The authors concluded that “the estimated prevalence of these retinal conditions is substantial, highlighting a large health care burden,” emphasizing that disparities by race, ethnicity, and geography “may aid in future resource planning” and efforts to improve access and outcomes.  

From Retinal Physician

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: