Subscribe to Newsletter

Choosing the Right Treatment for the Right Patient

sponsored by Bausch + Lomb

Download article pdf
VYZULTA® (latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution) 0.024% is indicated for the reduction of intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

What types of patients may benefit from VYZULTA?

Gagan Sawhney: I use VYZULTA for a number of types of open-angle glaucoma because it is approved for lowering both both normal and high pressure. Though I have had success across the entire disease spectrum, I see the best results in patients previously on one or no medications.

Janet Serle: Unlike many other topical IOP-reducing products, VYZULTA is only administered once a day. Based on its well-documented efficacy, this drug is an excellent treatment option in patients with ocular hypertension, or early to moderate open-angle glaucoma. I would certainly consider trying VYZULTA in patients who are inadequately controlled following selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and who need medical therapy.

Why might VYZULTA be a good option before adding medications?

Gagan Sawhney: Like all physicians, I have patients who are on medication and still not reaching their target pressure. If I want to get their pressure lower, I will put them on VYZULTA instead because I do believe that latanoprost combined with nitric oxide – a key component of VYZULTA – really helps reduce IOP.

Based on its well-documented efficacy, this drug is an excellent treatment option in patients with ocular hypertension, or early to moderate open-angle glaucoma.

What are your goals for treating newly-diagnosed patients?

Shan Lin: We often see patients who have already been treated by others and referred for further therapy, usually surgery, as well as newly-diagnosed patients. Like most doctors, I try to treat them with more conservative therapy first, such as IOP-lowering medications or laser trabeculoplasty. However, the majority of patients will choose to start off with a drop, as they deem laser to be a more invasive therapy.

The choice is primarily on the patient’s part, though some physicians also favor medication therapy as they can be started straight away, getting the patient’s pressure down more rapidly. Newer medications provide an alternative to laser for lowering IOP, in particular the prostaglandin class. VYZULTA, for example, has documented pressure lowering of over 35 percent in a majority of patients in a post hoc analysis of the Phase III trials (1).

Gagan Sawhney: Studies have shown that early aggressive treatment can help prevent visual field loss (2). In newly-diagnosed patients, I want to get a 30–40 percent IOP reduction – ideally achieve a pressure below 17 – and, with VYZULTA, we can achieve that; we get up to a 9-point reduction on average. What’s exciting is that the APOLLO and LUNAR studies found that 40.7 percent of patients got 40 percent or more reduction from baseline in a post hoc analysis of their Phase III trials (1), and that 90 percent of patients achieved a reduction of 25 percent or greater from baseline (1) – and that’s what I am typically seeing in my clinic, too.

Do you think that doctors should consider VYZULTA for patients with IOP in the normal range?

Janet Serle: The effect of VYZULTA in normal-tension or low-tension glaucoma patients with IOP essentially in the normal range was evaluated in a 1-year study of safety and efficacy in Japanese patients (3). The JUPITER study enrolled 130 patients with baseline IOPs ranging from 15–30 mmHg, and with a mean baseline IOP of 19.6 mmHg; approximately 75 percent of patients had a baseline IOP of 21 mmHg or below. Ninety-three percent of patients completed one year of dosing, and reductions in IOP were stable throughout the year, ranging from 22 to 26 percent. The JUPITER study clearly demonstrated that VYZULTA was effective, and showed its stability in reducing IOP. VYZULTA is well tolerated and certainly appears effective in patients with normal-tension glaucoma, and should be considered as a treatment option for patients with IOP in the normal range.

There are many therapies and surgical interventions that can lower IOP; does the method matter?

Shan Lin: I think I’m like most ophthalmologists in that I would like to avoid invasive penetrating glaucoma surgeries where possible. These days, surgical interventions tend to be interpreted as anything from minimally invasive procedures like laser trabeculoplasty to highly invasive trabeculectomies. I try to avoid going to the operating room and creating any potential situation where there may be risk of infection or severe bleeding because, for the glaucoma patient, doing a surgical procedure does not improve their vision. My colleagues and I would definitely prefer to have agents that can effectively lower IOP to a point that helps prevent further loss of vision, while being convenient for patients. In terms of the clinical use and side effect profile, it is incredibly useful to have a single agent that can lower the IOP in a single daily dose with a low side-effect profile. Such convenience can be very beneficial in terms of compliance for some patients.

Quang Nguyen: A good conversation with a patient is key. Some patients are prepared for the method to be more aggressive – the clinician has to get a feel for how the patient might react to different treatments and choose a game plan that is comfortable for both the patient and the doctor. Generally, the goal should be to bring the IOP as low as possible with one wisely chosen therapy, before escalating to other treatments. Adding medication to an existing therapy brings a host of challenges with it – and, in my practice, we have moved away from the “stockpile mentality.” Early in my career, we would choose a medication, then think about a laser procedure, and then add additional medications. But this attitude has now changed. For me, the maximum therapy tolerated by patients in the last decade has been two bottles/ three medications, such as a prostaglandin analog and a fixed combination. If there is still progression, I make the decision to move to a laser procedure or surgery.

Gagan Sawhney: We’re living in a “glaucoma renaissance,” where we have multiple treatment options when it comes to reducing the IOP. We’re not performing as many trabeculectomies or as much invasive surgery as we used to. We are now seeing a more stepwise approach, where we start off with medications before turning to minimally invasive surgery. If that fails, we move on to more invasive surgery. Fortunately, we’re often able to control the pressure before we get to that final step. Typically, I like to start patients off with a prostaglandin with proven efficacy, like VYZULTA, which allows me to focus on two different pathways in a single medication. It is a great way to initiate treatment for glaucoma.

Why should your peers consider treating glaucoma with VYZULTA?

Shan Lin: In clinical trials, VYZULTA lowers pressure by approximately 32 percent (4,5,6). When you have a once-a-day drug that has a favorable side effect profile for the reduction of IOP, you have a very strong first-line drug.

Janet Serle: Medications have a range of efficacy and tolerability in patients. In the case of VYZULTA, we know from clinical trials – and from anecdotal reported experience – that in the majority of patients this drug is effective at lowering the IOP, and it is well tolerated. And that’s why – if you haven’t used VYZULTA yet – I suggest you begin to prescribe it to appropriate patients with early glaucoma or hypertension, as well as patients with moderate and advanced, and low-tension glaucoma – those patients in your practice who need additional IOP control. It is a great medication for those who may have low compliance with more than one daily drop.

Gagan Sawhney: Collectively, we need to do a better job of treating glaucoma. We’re still getting visual field loss, and we’re still seeing progression of glaucoma that we are missing. When we initiate treatment, we need to make sure we get the most out of it, which is why I choose VYZULTA. By targeting diseased tissue in the trabecular meshwork, in addition to the uveoscleral pathway, it can get up to a 9-point reduction as demonstrated in clinical trials. It also offers convenient once-a-day dosing, low incidence of ocular adverse events, and minimal systemic adverse events – and it is increasingly easy to prescribe. Our practice partners with a local specialty pharmacy who works with the patient and insurance company on our behalf to get the patient VYZULTA as prescribed. They even mail the medication directly to patients.

Quang Nguyen: It’s a medication that can achieve an IOP of 18 mmHg or below in 69 percent of patients (7), and most patients tolerated it well in clinical trials (3, 4, 5, 7)... I guess the question should be: Why wouldn’t you treat your appropriate glaucoma patients with VYZULTA?

Shan Lin, Quang Nguyan, Gagan Sawhney and Janet Serle are consultants of
Bausch + Lomb.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

  • Increased pigmentation of the iris and periorbital tissue (eyelid) can occur. Iris pigmentation is likely to be permanent
  • Gradual changes to eyelashes, including increased length, increased thickness, and number of eyelashes, may occur. These changes are usually reversible upon treatment discontinuation
  • Use with caution in patients with a history of intraocular inflammation (iritis/uveitis). VYZULTA should generally not be used in patients with active intraocular inflammation
  • Macular edema, including cystoid macular edema, has been reported during treatment with prostaglandin analogs. Use with caution in aphakic patients, in pseudophakic patients with a torn posterior lens capsule, or in patients with known risk factors for macular edema
  • There have been reports of bacterial keratitis associated with the use of multiple-dose containers of topical ophthalmic products that were inadvertently contaminated by patients
  • Contact lenses should be removed prior to the administration of VYZULTA and may be reinserted 15 minutes after administration
  • Most common ocular adverse reactions with incidence ≥2% are conjunctival hyperemia (6%), eye irritation (4%), eye pain (3%), and instillation site pain (2%)
Click here for full Prescribing Information

 

You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088

Find out more: https://www.vyzultahcp.com/

 

VYZULTA and the V design are trademarks of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated or its affiliates
©2020 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated or its affiliates. All rights reserved – VYZ.0158.USA.20 – Date of preparation: December 2020
Click here for Making a Difference with VYZULTA®
Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Ophthalmologist and its sponsors.

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

  1. JH Peace, JL Vittitow, “Latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution 0.024% for IOP lowering in glaucoma: responder rates in phase 3 studies,” Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Meeting, October 2016, Chicago, IL
  2. MC Leske et al., “Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial,” Arch Ophthalmol, 121, 48 (2003). PMID: 12523884.
  3. K Kawase et al., “Long-term safety and efficacy of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% in Japanese subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the JUPITER study,” Adv Ther, 33, 1612 (2016). PMID: 27457469.
  4. RN Weinreb et al., “Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% versus timolol maleate 0.5% in subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the APOLLO study,” Ophthalmology, 123, 965 (2016). PMID: 26875002.
  5. FA Medeiros et al., “Comparison of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% and timolol maleate 0.5% in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the LUNAR study,” Am J Ophthalmol, 168, 250 (2016). PMID: 27210275.
  6. RN Weinreb et al., “Latanoprostene Bunod 0.024% in subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: pooled phase 3 study findings,” J Glaucoma, 27, 7 (2018). PMID: 29194198.
  7. RN Weinreb et al., “A randomised, controlled comparison of latanoprostene bunod and latanoprost 0.005% in the treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma: the VOYAGER study,” Br J Ophthalmol, 99, 738 (2014).
    PMID: 25488946.
Product Profiles

Access our product directory to see the latest products and services from our industry partners

Here
Register to The Ophthalmologist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Ophthalmologist magazine

Register