Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2025 / Feb / Non-Valved GDD Comparison
Research & Innovations Glaucoma

Non-Valved GDD Comparison

New Japanese study compares pressure resistance in the Paul Glaucoma Implant and Ahmed ClearPath 250

By The Ophthalmologist 2/6/2025 1 min read

Share

Original image credit: AdobeStock.com

A new Translational Vision Science and Technology (TVST) study has evaluated the pressure resistance of two non-valved glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) – the Paul Glaucoma Implant (PGI) and Ahmed ClearPath 250 (ACP) – with and without polypropylene threads inserted inside their tubes. The research aimed to understand how these modifications impact intraocular pressure (IOP) control and the risk of hypotony after surgery.

The study measured flow pressure at different rates (1-5 µL/min) for both implants. Without a thread, PGI maintained a relatively stable, low pressure, while the addition of a 6-0 polypropylene thread significantly increased pressure resistance. This suggests that the PGI with a 6-0 thread may not require external tube ligation to prevent post-surgical hypotony.

For ACP, the presence of a 4-0 polypropylene thread resulted in slightly higher pressure resistance, but still required external ligation to prevent excessive aqueous drainage. However, when a 3-0 thread was used, pressure resistance increased further, suggesting that ligature-free implantation may be possible, though this would require clinical validation.

The findings highlight that pressure resistance varies significantly based on device design and modifications. It was noted that the PGI with a 6-0 thread may prevent postoperative hypotony without additional ligation, while the ACP with a 4-0 thread still requires ligation. However, a 3-0 thread may provide enough resistance to avoid it.

As such, the researchers note that clinicians should consider tube diameter, polypropylene thread type, and pressure resistance when selecting drainage devices for glaucoma patients.

While the study provides valuable insights into non-valved glaucoma device selection, it was conducted in vitro, meaning that clinical trials are now needed to confirm whether these modifications translate to real-world surgical outcomes. Understanding the fluid dynamics of different GDDs could improve surgical techniques and lead to better outcomes for glaucoma patients.

About the Author(s)

The Ophthalmologist

More Articles by The Ophthalmologist

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: