We’ve learned our lessons from mixing and matching the first generations of mIOLs. Applying them to current mIOLs should lead to success with today’s multifocal lenses
Matteo Piovella |
At a Glance
- Early multifocal IOLs were something of a mixed bag – variations in vision caused by pupil diameter and problems achieving good intermediate vision made true spectacle-independence a challenge
- The long-term data on mixing refractive and diffractive IOLs produced good results and revealed important lessons to apply to newer mIOLs
- Refractive accuracy, achieving good near and intermediate vision, and careful patient selection are crucial factors to take into account
- Surgeons who have achieved good results (despite the limitations of past mIOLs) should see even greater successes in the future
When multifocal IOLs (mIOLs) were first introduced, the idea of giving my patients good vision without glasses really excited me. But as I soon discovered, first and even the second generations of presbyopia-correcting IOLs weren’t without their limitations.
Read the full article now
Log in or register to read this article in full and gain access to The Ophthalmologist’s entire content archive. It’s FREE and always will be!
Or register now - it’s free and always will be!
You will benefit from:
- Unlimited access to ALL articles
- News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
- Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Ophthalmologist magazine
Or Login via Social Media
By clicking on any of the above social media links, you are agreeing to our Privacy Notice.