Cookies

Like most websites The Ophthalmologist uses cookies. In order to deliver a personalized, responsive service and to improve the site, we remember and store information about how you use it. Learn more.
Subscribe to Newsletter
Subspecialties Basic & Translational Research, Business and Innovation

Frame Freedom

Additive manufacturing, more commonly known as 3D printing, is being used to fabricate increasingly complex medical equipment and devices. Perhaps unsurprisingly, it’s can also be used to create custom spectacle frames for pediatric patients with congenital and acquired craniofacial abnormalities. And that’s great news; if conventional glasses do not fit comfortably, children are less likely – or possibly unable – to wear glasses daily, which increases the risk of vision loss secondary to refractive amblyopia. But you need to start with the right information.

Until now, CT or MRI scans have been used to inform custom designs ahead of 3D printing – but this creates a bottleneck and drives up cost. In search of a solution that was more affordable, more portable, and non invasive, a team at the University of California in San Francisco decided to test the potential of 3D surface imaging (3DSI), using a smartphone equipped with a TrueDepth camera (1).

Notably, a 3DSI scan was only considered successful if six key parameters (face width, distance from ear bridge to nasal bridge, distance from center of pupil to center of nasal bridge, distance from lateral to medial canthus, ear vertical offset, and nasal bridge width) were within 5 percent of the same measurement by MRI.

Impressive. But how does this accuracy translate to the resulting 3D-printed spectacles? Well, they were often close to perfection at the prototype stage, with very few revisions (an average of 1.7) required for the final frame. And, more importantly, all 20 children in the study came away with glasses that could be worn daily without irritation.

Receive content, products, events as well as relevant industry updates from The Ophthalmologist and its sponsors.

When you click “Subscribe” we will email you a link, which you must click to verify the email address above and activate your subscription. If you do not receive this email, please contact us at [email protected].
If you wish to unsubscribe, you can update your preferences at any point.

  1. AG de Alba Campomanes et al., JAMA Ophthalmol, [Online ahead of print] (2022). PMID: 36048438.
About the Author
Geoffrey Potjewyd

Associate Editor, The Ophthalmologist

The lion’s share of my PhD was spent in the lab, and though I mostly enjoyed it (mostly), what I particularly liked was the opportunity to learn about the latest breakthroughs in research. Communicating science to a wider audience allows me to scratch that itch without working all week only to find my stem cell culture has given up the ghost on the Friday (I’m not bitter). Fortunately for me, it turns out writing is actually fun – so by working for Texere I get to do it every day, whilst still being an active member of the clinical and research community.

Product Profiles

Access our product directory to see the latest products and services from our industry partners

Here
Register to The Ophthalmologist

Register to access our FREE online portfolio, request the magazine in print and manage your preferences.

You will benefit from:
  • Unlimited access to ALL articles
  • News, interviews & opinions from leading industry experts
  • Receive print (and PDF) copies of The Ophthalmologist magazine

Register