Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2021 / Jul / Diagnosis: Glaucoma
Glaucoma Research & Innovations

Diagnosis: Glaucoma

Single gene testing may not be sufficient to identify a high risk of glaucoma

By Geoffrey Potjewyd 7/30/2021 1 min read

Share

A new genetic test that factors in both polygenic and monogenic glaucoma risk variants could result in a 15-fold increase of people being identified as glaucoma suspects (1). Researchers analyzed the association of monogenic and polygenic variants with glaucoma risk – using clinical and genetic data from an Australian/New Zealand glaucoma database (ANZRAG, containing data from 2,507 individuals) and from the UK Biobank (data from 411,337 individuals). Both polygenic and monogenic variants have a comparable risk of developing glaucoma – over a 2.5-fold increase. But high-risk polygenic variants were six times more common than monogenic variants within the ANZRAG database – and more than 15 times more common within the general population (UK Biobank) data. 

Although single gene testing is used clinically, a stratified approach of monogenic and polygenic testing will increase opportunities to save patients’ sight. 

References

  1. OM Siggs et al., JAMA Ophthalmol, [Online ahead of print] (2021). PMID: 34264281.

About the Author(s)

Geoffrey Potjewyd

The lion’s share of my PhD was spent in the lab, and though I mostly enjoyed it (mostly), what I particularly liked was the opportunity to learn about the latest breakthroughs in research. Communicating science to a wider audience allows me to scratch that itch without working all week only to find my stem cell culture has given up the ghost on the Friday (I’m not bitter). Fortunately for me, it turns out writing is actually fun – so by working for Texere I get to do it every day, whilst still being an active member of the clinical and research community.

More Articles by Geoffrey Potjewyd

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: