Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2014 / Oct / Benchmarking VMA/VMT
Retina

Benchmarking VMA/VMT

What does analysis of the last five years of the literature on vitreomacular traction/ adhesion tell us about the priorities of the field and the major contributors to it?

By Mark Hillen 10/16/2014 1 min read

Share

Vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) occurs when the vitreous of the eye adheres to the retina in an atypically strong manner. Usually, the vitreous separates from the retina as part of the normal aging process, but if this separation is not complete – that is, there is still an adhesion – this can create pulling forces on the retina that may result in visual distortion, or even loss. The adhesion may not be dangerous in itself, but the resulting pathological vitreomacular traction (VMT) can cause severe ocular damage. The current standard of care for treating these adhesions is pars plana vitrectomy, but an alternative, an injectable protease called ocriplasmin, has been available for the treatment of VMT since 2013.

To provide insight into the past and predictions for the future of the field, a series of metrics were applied to the last five years of the published literature. We asked: What are the major topics for the field? Which publications have the greatest impact? How is the knowledge available online? Who are the most prolific authors? Has the clinical development of ocriplasmin altered what is published over time?

PubMed was searched for: vitreomacular AND (traction OR adhesion), with results limited to the last five years, in humans (for a clinical focus). The data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel 2013

About the Author(s)

Mark Hillen

I spent seven years as a medical writer, writing primary and review manuscripts, congress presentations and marketing materials for numerous – and mostly German – pharmaceutical companies. Prior to my adventures in medical communications, I was a Wellcome Trust PhD student at the University of Edinburgh.

More Articles by Mark Hillen

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: