Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2015 / Nov / Higher Myopia Risk in Firstborns

Higher Myopia Risk in Firstborns

A recent study on risk factors for myopia show it doesn’t always pay to be the eldest child…

By Michael Schubert 11/5/2015 1 min read

Share

As we’ve previously reported (1), rates of myopia are huge and rising – but the reasons for this remain, largely, a mystery. A range of potential causes, such as genetic factors, close work, and time spent outside have been identified as likely contributors. But another is birth order – the theory is that parents invest more time and resources in the education of their firstborn, increasing their exposure to close work (and possibly reducing time outdoors), and therefore their risk of myopia, when compared with younger siblings.

A recent study, published on World Sight Day in JAMA Ophthalmology, has explored the link between myopia and birth order further, using data from 89,000 UK Biobank participants. Those included were aged between 40 to 69 years, self-reported white ethnicity, and had no history of eye problems, such as cataracts or serious eye trauma. After adjusting for variables, including gender, age, and the Townsend Deprivation Index score, the authors found that first-born children were around 10 percent more likely to have myopia, and 20 percent more likely to have high myopia than their siblings (2).

The potential link was reinforced when the study authors adjusted for one of two measures of educational exposure: highest education qualification or age at completion of full-time education. This caused the relationship between birth order and myopia to disappear, strongly suggesting that increased educational investment does account for the higher risk. As the study was carried out in an older cohort than in previous studies (3), it also shows that this environmental factor isn’t new, and has been around for at least 30 to 40 years. There were some limitations though – the study didn’t include any information on time spent outdoors as a child. The use of self-reporting to exclude participants with cataracts, and the large age range used, may also have affected the robustness of the results. Nevertheless, the study authors conclude that their analysis “supports a role for reduced parental investment in education of children with later birth orders in their relative protection from myopia.”

References

  1. R Gallagher, “Myopia Dystopia”, The Ophthalmologist, 3, 16–21 (2013). https://theophthalmologist.com/issues/0313/301. JA Guggenheim, et al., “Role of educational exposure in the association between myopia and birth order”, JAMA Ophthalmol, [Epub ahead of print] (2015). PMID: 26448589. JA Guggenheim, et al., “Birth order and myopia”, Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 20, 375–384 (2013). PMID: 24168726.

About the Author(s)

Michael Schubert

While obtaining degrees in biology from the University of Alberta and biochemistry from Penn State College of Medicine, I worked as a freelance science and medical writer. I was able to hone my skills in research, presentation and scientific writing by assembling grants and journal articles, speaking at international conferences, and consulting on topics ranging from medical education to comic book science. As much as I’ve enjoyed designing new bacteria and plausible superheroes, though, I’m more pleased than ever to be at Texere, using my writing and editing skills to create great content for a professional audience.

More Articles by Michael Schubert

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: